Warp, Weft, and Way

A Group Blog of Chinese and Comparative Philosophy

CFP: ISCP at 2013 Pacific APA (with summary of CFPs)

International Society for Chinese Philosophy (ISCP) plans to host two sessions at the 2013 Pacific Division Meeting of American Philosophical Association (APA), San Francisco, March 27-30.

You are invited to submit panel proposal or paper abstract. The paper abstract should be about 100-200 words. If you submit a panel proposal, please provide a panel title, abstract of each paper, affiliations of the presenters and commentators. Panel proposals with a unified theme are encouraged and preferred. For individual paper submissions, priority will go to those that can be grouped into a themed session. Submissions related to the topic “Action in Chinese Philosophy” are especially encouraged.

Since our pacific liaison Professor Robin Wang is on her sabbatical leave, Jiyuan Yu will serve as the acting liaison this year. Please send the submissions electronically to jyyu@buffalo.edu.

The deadline for submission is Sept 15, 2012. Submissions will be reviewed by the Executive Board.

P.S Forthcoming ISCP activities:

Advertisements

August 22, 2012 - Posted by | Call for Papers (CFP)

4 Comments »

  1. I don’t wanna hurt your feelings, but “Chinese philosophy” is such an unprofessional title for your society and the conference. It’s the 21st century. Time to get scientific. You cannot simply use Hellenic or Christian concepts and annotate “Chinese” to get the China you want to see. Things have smartened up. You now can look it up and find out the real China. And the word “philosophy” doesn’t appear in any of the Chinese classics. -Thorsten Pattberg

    Comment by Thorsten Pattberg | August 23, 2012 | Reply

    • No, none of the non-Chinese words appear in the Chinese classics. Neither does “Chinese classics,” for that same reason. Maybe we shouldn’t discuss target literature in non-target languages at all. But that seems drastic. I’m not sure which “science” it is to which you refer. You seem smart; engagement rather than dismissiveness would be helpful but if you’d rather not engage constructively, well… leave us to wallow in our crude inquiries.

      Comment by Manyul Im | August 23, 2012 | Reply

    • After several minutes thinking about this…somehow I’m most hung up that you introduced it with “I don’t wanna hurt your feelings.” People here are pretty amenable to reasoning, and most of us are familiar with the dangers and pitfalls of translation across radically different traditions. That we have not concluded as you have does not mean our “feelings” are in any way at stake.

      If you’d rather we conduct ourselves in Chinese, advice doesn’t get any more Sinitic than this: 順物自然,而無容私焉.

      Comment by अलमनेन | August 26, 2012 | Reply

    • Philosophy might have the meaning of love to wisdom. Not wisdom. Philosophy is the way to wisdom. where this way ends wisdom might start. In this sense every culture has a philosophy. Every culture has a love for wisdom. Every culture is on the long way to wisdom. Good luck. Christian Thomas Kohl

      Comment by kohl | September 2, 2012 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s