Warp, Weft, and Way

A Group Blog of Chinese and Comparative Philosophy

Comparative Philosophy Seminar

I’m working up a syllabus for a seminar in  Comparative Philosophy for a new M.A. program that we are starting at E.M.U. (not official yet, but almost there).  Below is what I have come up with for my first draft.  If you have taught a course in Comparative Philosophy, or have contemplated doing so, I’d appreciate any feedback you can offer with regard to readings and topics.

As for the readings that have been included, you can see that I construe the overall subject matter fairly broadly (or do I?).

The course is divided roughly into two halves.  The first half covers issues in comparative philosophy.  The second half is broken further into two sections, the first of which covers actual examples of doing comparative philosophy; and the second of which covers classic texts that provide good opportunities for comparative analysis–to give the students an opportunity to practice and thereby realize first hand the many issues and difficulties involved.  The last few weeks are devoted to readings that propose how to use comparative methods to make advances in current philosophy.  I’ll probably swap those readings out for readings from an anthology that I am working on at the moment–the theme of which is using the resources of the Chinese tradition to advance issues in current philosophy.

Syllabus

Philosophy 590 – Comparative Philosophy

Professor: Brian Bruya

Course Description

Philosophy 590 is a course on the methods and methodology of comparative philosophy.  Methodology is the study of the possibility, use, and limits of methods.  Insofar as we will be studying the methodology of comparative philosophy, we will be focusing on the possibility and the limitations of adopting and comparing complex ideas across languages and cultures.  As such, we will consider in detail cultural and linguistic commensurability, hermeneutics, and relativism.  With regard to method, we will be learning how to engage and interpret complex philosophical ideas that originate outside of the contemporary idiom.  We will consider their conceptual and linguistic genealogies and learn profitable ways of comparing them to similar ideas of different origin.

Required Texts

Larson, Gerald James and Eliot Deutsch (eds.). Interpreting Across Boundaries: New Essays in Comparative Philosophy.  Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988.

Kuhn, Thomas S..  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.  Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970

Coursepack

Schedule

 

I. ISSUES IN COMPARATIVE PHILOSOPHY

Week 1  What is Comparative Philosophy?

Staal, Fritz.  “Is There Philosophy in Asia?” In Larson, Interpreting Across Boundaries. 27 pgs

Nakamura, Hajime. “The Meaning of the Terms ‘Philosophy’ and ‘Religion’ in Various Traditions.” In Larson, Interpreting Across Boundaries.  15 pgs

Krishna, Daya.  “Comparative Philosophy: What It Is and What It Ought to Be.”  In Larson, Interpreting Across Boundaries.  13 pages

Cua, A. S. “Reflections on Moral Theory and Understanding Moral Traditions.” In Larson, Interpreting Across Boundaries.  14 pages

Weeks 2-3 Commensurability

Whorf, Benjamin, “The Relation of Habitual Thought and Behavior to Language.” In Language, Thought, and Reality. 18 pages

Quine, W.V.  “Main Trends in Recent Philosophy: Two Dogmas of Empiricism.” 23 pages

Davidson, Donald. “On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme.” 15 pages

Potter, Karl. “Metaphor as Key to Understanding the Thought of Other Speech Communities.” In Larson, Interpreting Across Boundaries. 18 pages

Kuhn, Thomas. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 210 pages

Radiolab, “Words.” http://www.radiolab.org/2010/aug/09/

Weeks  4-5  Hermeneutics

Von Uexkull, Jakob.  “A Stroll through the World of Animals and Men.” In Schiller, Instinctive Behavior. 75 pages

Dilthey, Wilhelm. “The Rise of Hermeneutics.” In Hermeneutics and the Study of History. 14 pages

Gadamer, Hans-Georg.  “On the Universality of the Hermeneutic Problem” in Philosophical Hermeneutics. 15 pages

Deutsch, Eliot. “Knowledge and the Tradition Text in Indian Philosophy.” In Larson, Interpreting Across Boundaries. 9 pages

Smart, Ninian. The Analogy of Meaning and the Tasks of Comparative Philosophy.” In Larson, Interpreting Across Boundaries.  10 pages

Chan, Wing-tsit. “Chu Hsi and World Philosophy.” In Larson, Interpreting Across Boundaries. 35 pages

Week 6  Relativism

Plato: Theatetus, selection.

Feyerabend, “Notes on Relativism.”  In Farewell to Reason. 12 pages

Rorty, Richard, “Pragmatism, Relativism, and Irrationality.” 22 pages

Rosemont, Henry, Jr.  “Against Relativism.”  In Larson, Interpreting Across Boundaries. 35 pages

Scharfstein, Ben-Ami. “The Contextual Fallacy.” In Larson, Interpreting Across Boundaries.  14 pages

II. EXAMPLES AND PRACTICE

Weeks 7-8  Examples

Preston, Beth. “Biological and Cultural Proper Functions in Comparative Perspective.” In Krohs,  Functions in Biological and Artificial Worlds: Comparative Perspectives.  13 pages

Burik, Steven. “Thinking, Philosophy, and Language: Comparing Heidegger, Derrida, and Classical Daoism.” In The End of Comparative Philosophy and the Task of Comparative Thinking: Heidegger, Derrida, and Daoism. 53 pages

Loy, David. “The Deconstruction of Dualism.” In Non-Duality: A Study in Comparative Philosophy.  59 pages

Shaner, David Edward. “Science and Comparative Philosophy.” In Shaner, et. al., Science and Comparative Philosophy: Introducing the Philosophy of Yuasa Yasuo.  76 pages

Yuasa, Yasuo, “Contemporary Science and an Eastern Body-Mind Theory.” In Shaner, et. al., Science and Comparative Philosophy: Introducing the Philosophy of Yuasa Yasuo  47 pages

Yuasa Yasuo, “A Cultural Background for Traditional Japanese Self-Cultivation Philosophy.” In Shaner, et. al., Science and Comparative Philosophy: Introducing the Philosophy of Yuasa Yasuo  36 pages

Week 9 Practice: Philosophy in General

Plato, Last Days of Socrates, selections

Confucius, Analects, selections

Week 10 Practice: Idealism

Berkeley, Three Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous, selections

Shankara, Crest-Jewel of Discrimination, selections

Week 11 Practice: Skepticism

Hume, An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding, selections

Zhuangzi, Inner Chapters, selections

Weeks 12-14  Non-Western Philosophy as an Avenue to Better Contemporary Philosophy

Bruya, “Rehabilitation of Spontaneity”  43 pages

Jullien, Detour and Access, selections

Jullien, The Propensity of Things, selections

December 2, 2012 Posted by | Chinese philosophy | Leave a comment

Chair a Panel at Eastern APA

The Society for Asian and Comparative Philosophy invites volunteers to chair its two panels at the Eastern APA in December, 2012.  The panels are: 1) Language, Law, and Spirituality in Early China and 2) Mind and World in Classical Chinese Philosophy.  If you are interested, please contact panel coordinator, Brian Bruya: bbruya@emich.edu.

June 11, 2012 Posted by | Chinese philosophy | Leave a comment

SACP Announces Panels at Eastern APA

The Society for Asian and Comparative Philosophy has announced its two panels for the Eastern APA, as follows:

Continue reading

August 21, 2011 Posted by | Chinese philosophy, Conference | Leave a comment

Which Resources Do You Recommend for Interpreting Classical Chinese Terminology?

This is a follow-up to Manyul’s recent post about the TLS.

I’m wondering whether professors of Chinese philosophy at English-speaking universities encourage their students to begin to access terms in the original Chinese.  Perhaps it would be as simple as referring them to the glossary in the back of Ivanhoe and Van Norden’s Readings in Classical Chinese Philosophy and then prompting them to be aware of those key terms in their reading, or it could be as complex as asking them to research a particular term across various texts.

There are a couple of reasons for asking.  The first is that I have a belief that beginning to entertain the notion that there is more to a Chinese term’s semantic field than is represented in any particular translation yields a more profitable understanding for the student, and (assuming others hold the same belief) I’m curious about how others go about encouraging that.  The second is that the potential of computing power to help in this regard is now quite high, and so I am wondering how electronic resources may be playing a role.  The perspective I’m looking for is that of the professor who is teaching the student who is not competent in Chinese.

There are also other perspectives that will be different but just as illuminating for me:  Continue reading

July 1, 2011 Posted by | Chinese philosophy, Pedagogy | | 5 Comments